IHRM


International Human resource management

Gerard Hendrik (Geert) Hofstede (born 2 October 1928 in Haarlem) is a Dutch social psychologist, former IBM employee, and Professor Emeritus of Organizational Anthropology and International Management at Maastricht University in the Netherlands.well known for his pioneering research on cross-cultural groups and organizations. His most notable work has been in developing cultural dimensions theory.




Hofstede theory of culture:


Hofstede's cultural dimensions theory is a framework for cross-cultural communication, developed by Geert Hofstede. It describes the effects of a society's culture on thevalues of its members, and how these values relate to behavior, using a structure derived from factor analysis.

-Hofstede developed his original model as a result of using factor analysis to examine the results of a world-wide survey of employee values by IBM between 1967 and 1973.






  • This dimension expresses the degree to which the less powerful members of a society accept and expect that power is distributed unequally
  • The fundamental issue here is how a society handles inequalities among people. People in societies exhibiting a large degree of Power Distance accept a hierarchical order in which everybody has a place and which needs no further justification.
  •  In societies with low Power Distance, people strive to equalize the distribution of power and demand justification for inequalities of power.

  • The high side of this dimension, called individualism, can be defined as a preference for a loosely-knit social framework in which individuals are expected to take care of only themselves and their immediate families. 
  • Its opposite, collectivism, represents a preference for a tightly-knit framework in society in which individuals can expect their relatives or members of a particular in-group to look after them in exchange for unquestioning loyalty.
  •  A society's position on this dimension is reflected in whether people’s self-image is defined in terms of “I” or “we.”

  • The Masculinity side of this dimension represents a preference in society for achievement, heroism, assertiveness and material rewards for success. 
  • Society at large is more competitive. Its opposite, femininity, stands for a preference for cooperation, modesty, caring for the weak and quality of life. 
  • Society at large is more consensus-oriented. In the business context Masculinity versus Femininity is sometimes also related to as "tough versus tender" cultures.

  • The Uncertainty Avoidance dimension expresses the degree to which the members of a society feel uncomfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity. 
  • The fundamental issue here is how a society deals with the fact that the future can never be known: should we try to control the future or just let it happen? Countries exhibiting strong UAI maintain rigid codes of belief and behaviour and are intolerant of unorthodox behaviour and ideas. 
  • Weak UAI societies maintain a more relaxed attitude in which practice counts more than principles.



  • Every society has to maintain some links with its own past while dealing with the challenges of the present and the future. Societies prioritize these two existential goals differently.
  • Societies who score low on this dimension, for example, prefer to maintain time-honoured traditions and norms while viewing societal change with suspicion. 
  • Those with a culture which scores high, on the other hand, take a more pragmatic approach: they encourage thrift and efforts in modern education as a way to prepare for the future.
In the business context this dimension is related to as "(short term) normative versus (long term) pragmatic" (PRA). In the academic environment the terminology Monumentalism versus Flexhumility is sometimes also used.


  • Indulgence stands for a society that allows relatively free gratification of basic and natural human drives related to enjoying life and having fun.  
  • Restraint stands for a society that suppresses gratification of needs and regulates it by means of strict social norms.














No comments:

Post a Comment